• Products
  • Supremacy
    • Supremacy 2020 -Game of Superpowers
    • Supremacy Rules Questions
    • Supremacy Tutorial
    • Strategy of Mother Russia
    • Strategy of the Rising Sun: Players Strategy for Japan
    • Ukraine
    • Strategy in the Cards
    • RDFs
    • Mega Supremacy
  • Gettysburg
    • Gettysburg
    • Antietam Tutorial
  • Waterloo
    • Waterloo
    • Battle of Marengo
    • Marengo Q&A
    • Brandywine
    • Brandywine Q&A
    • Brandywine Tutorial
    • Brandywine Options
  • Little Bighorn
    • Little Bighorn Q&A
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  •  
Command Post Games

Risk –Game of World Conquest

In many ways this is the game that started it all.  It is many people’s first ‘wargame’.  Risk sets the basic foundation in rules that most other wargames are built on.  There are many things going on here:  geographical areas, armies, turns, attacker, defender, controlling areas, movement, rolling dice to resolve combat, reinforcements that grow based on the territory you hold.  That is a lot to take in if you just graduated from Trouble and Monopoly.

game

 

Many veteran wargamers like to scoff at Risk.  It is often used as an insult:  “What kind of rule is that?  We might as well be playing Risk!”  Compared to our advanced and sophisticated palate, Risk seems pretty crude looking back.  Don’t discount this old, simple, quirky gem.  In many ways, Risk is the gateway drug into our hobby.  New kids learn many of these basic concepts and then yearn for something more.  Something more advanced, more accurate.  The new guys have to start somewhere.  You can’t start college at age 5.  You have to work your way up through elementary and high school first.  I think our hobby could actually benefit from more simple, introductory games like Risk.  I also urge you old, crusty grognards (like me) to grab a copy of this classic and play it with kids.  They are the future of the hobby we all enjoy so much.

Why do veterans have such an aversion to Risk?  For all it’s great achievements, there are some, well…. objectionable things.  As you grow into more realistic and accurate games, things start to bother you about Risk.  Here is an example:  Where are the navies?  What?  My armies just magically float across magic dotted lines?  Really?  Now we all sacrifice some realism for playability but come on!   This was one of our primary design goals for Supremacy 2020:  remove the ‘objectionable things’.  We wanted to keep it simple and accessible to new players but also make it enjoyable for veterans.  This makes Supremacy 2020 especially well suited to bridge the gap between novices and veterans.  Something we can all play.

So, how does the new Supremacy 2020 compare to Risk?  What ‘objectionable things’ did we remove?  This is a great question to explore:

 

Navies

Let’s start with the magic dotted lines.  Supremacy has navies.  The navies carry your armies to other continents.  You can land anywhere you want to invade.  You can also defend against an invasion with your navies.  Another fascinating thing you can do with them is Blockade.  This allows you to effectively shut down the economic production of an area, if you control the seas around it.  Navies can be very powerful.  If you control the seas, you can strangle the enemies economy to a standstill and virtually invade and strike him anywhere at any time.  Very powerful stuff but also very simple in terms of rules.


 

Map

The next improvement is very subtle.  To the untrained eye, they both just look like game maps with a bunch of random areas drawn.  That actually maybe true for Risk but for Supremacy 2020, an incredible amount of research went into the map.  How much of an area can ground troops cover?  How far can they move?  We actually analyzed campaigns from WWII thoroughly.  (The most recent major war to gauge from.)  What did nations fight over?  Where did they deploy?  Compare a real map of the world to the game board.  You will notice that some major ‘warping’ has occurred.  We sized areas relative to their interests and importance for fighting.  Places like Africa and South America are much smaller.  Europe has been blown up greatly in scale to give players room to place massive piles of armies.

What are the natural barriers created by deserts, rivers, mountain ranges and weather zones?  What are the infrastructures in place that are able to support the movement of logistics and primary avenues of attack?  We actually started with a map designed to accurately simulate WWII, complete with terrain, cities, rail lines and weather.  This was too complicated for Supremacy, so most of these things were later abstracted out and simplified.  The work was still worthwhile and its impacts are still felt.  Fight a few campaigns back and forth across the Supremacy 2020 map.  It ‘feels’ right.  It is hard to put your finger on exactly how or why.  This is the intangible result of all this excellent research.

risk-board-game


 

Time

How much time in the real world does a turn of Risk actually represent?  Hmmmmm……   Well, let’s calculate from the activity.   Since I can attack from Austrailia and fight all the way across Asia, through Europe, across North America and down into South America all in 1 turn with my 18th century armies, I guess it must be about 10 years long.  So, I get to continually attack you for 10 years before you get a chance to respond?  Yes, it’s pretty absurd if you actually do the math.  Not even remotely possible compared to anything in the real world.  This is the type of thing that makes many veteran wargamers shutter.  (or worse)

Ok, so what does Supremacy 2020 do?  How long are their turns?  They are abstracted like Risk.  There is no exact definition.  The turns are meant to be ambiguous and floating according to activity levels.  Judging from the campaigns possible, I would say from 6 months to a year and a half.

The key difference is that activity is matched to real military campaigns possible.  How much ground can you take in 1 attack?  Players are pretty closely limited to what could be accomplished in the real world.  After the attack, both sides can reinforce.  Then the defender can counterattack.  This is huge.  Players trading blows results in a balanced and accurate campaign.

risk-board-game-strategies-6530


 

Logistics

Supremacy 2020 also accounts for logistical restraints.  You can’t just fight every turn until you have no men left.  You must pay for every attack with a set of resources.  This takes logistics into account.  You also can’t fight all the way around the world in 1 turn.  You would run out of supplies.  Another concern is building new forces.  You need those same supplies to build.  Yes, ponder the strategic implications of that.  Every attack you make is a set of new armies you will not be able to build at the end of the turn.  You have to strike a balance between supplying the forces you already have and building new forces.  Tricky.


 

Economics

The production in Risk is not scaled to areas.  Each area counts the same.  So, the Congo and Madagascar are worth the same as eastern USA and northern Europe.  The really big and valuable production works out to be mostly random dumb luck:   Reinforcement cards.  Who goes first?  Who got what bonus?  Who could wait one more turn before they play cards?

In Supremacy 2020, the economic game is a whole game unto itself.  As simple as it is, it is very realistic.  You get Company cards.  Your cards produce vital strategic resources:  Minerals, Oil, Grain.  You can trade these on the market for profit.  You will also need them to build and attack with.  The trouble comes when we both pull big oil cards in Saudi Arabia.  Or you pull a big card in my country.  If I control the area, I can seize it.  And  yes, the cards are sized to the real world.  Saudi Arabia has big oil companies.  South Africa has big mineral companies.  The Midwest USA has big grain companies.


 

Victory

One of the biggest problems Risk has is victory.  It is zero sum, winner take all game.  Six players sit to play.  Five of them are losers.  Only 1 person wins.  The only way he wins is to take everyone out of the game.  How much fun is a game that you are knocked out of on the first turn?  Then it continues for hours. It doesn’t matter too much by the end.  Almost everyone but the winner, end up feeling like they were cheated somehow.

We struggled with these same issues while developing Supremacy 2020.  It’s the same game really.  Risk with nukes.  So we were faced with all the same problems.  How to overcome them?  We debated this for a long time with play test groups.  We experimented on many different types of systems.  In many ways, Supremacy is even harder to balance because we have ICBMs!  Ok, we nuked half the planet into radioactive ash.  Everybody loses.  What?!  After playing for 4 hours everybody loses?  What kind of game is that?

It took a long time, a lot of hard work and debate but in the end we have something very special.  You don’t win in Supremacy 2020 by destroying or conquering everybody.  You win by finishing with the most points. You got nuked out on turn 2?  Ok, it can happen.  No problem.  Just record your points and sit tight.  You can still win!  The game will likely be over by turn 4, so you don’t have to wait too long.  It cost lots of points to nuke targets, so you need to have a big point lead before you push the button.  Nuking the enemy will put them ahead of you in points if you are not careful.

So how do you win in Supremacy 2020?  You build the biggest and strongest Superpower on earth.  –Or more accurately:   You are the biggest and strongest Superpower when the game ends for you.


 

Conclusion

Don’t get me wrong.  We don’t mean to slam Risk.  We love Risk.  It is a classic that is still very relevant and useful today.  You have to start somewhere. Candy Land isn’t realistic either but you need to learn the concepts of pieces, turns and moving before you can play other games.  You can’t go from Candy Land to World in Flames.  It’s too big of a jump.  We need games to lead players through levels of complexity and sophistication.  Risk is the extremely important first rung on the ladder of wargames.  Supremacy 2020 makes the perfect next step.

 Axis & Allies Review

 

0
SHARES
ShareTweet
3 Comments

3 thoughts on “Risk –Game of World Conquest”

  1. James O'Neill says:
    September 24, 2017 at 1:17 am

    Have you tried RISK Europe? It’s actually nothing like RISK, which was also my first wargame over 50 years ago, but it plays beautifully. I think Hasbro are selling it off cheaply since they realised that it shouldn’t be under the RISK banner. It is more of a mediæval, card-driven area control game.

    I love the Pub Battles series.

    Regards,

    Jim O’Neill

    Reply
    • Dale Munz says:
      November 2, 2020 at 7:18 pm

      Aaah RISK. One of my first wargames over 60 years ago! My friend and I would play for hours. We would have so many armies built up it took many turns to fight over one territory. I bought it for my grandson a couple of years ago. We played a few games, but it wasn’t his thing, so it’s mine now. I was looking for some ideas for maps to try to set up a Napoleonic solo campaign and remembered RISK. I tried it in a few ways and am still working with it. I wouldn’t play it as a wargame now, but it makes for a very convenient and interesting campaign strategy map to move armies around until battles are enjoined. It may not be the ultimate, but for its convenience and easy of use I give it good marks.

      Reply
      • admin says:
        November 2, 2020 at 7:49 pm

        Yes! I really liked the old Castle Risk they released. We reworked the rules a little and turned it into a respectable strategic Napoleonic game. Still very, very simple. Most wargamers probably wouldn’t like it. We thought about release our version of this. Instead we are leaning towards just making our own Napoleonic Supremacy game. Take it up a few notches.

        Reply

Leave a comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Pages

  • Antietam Tutorial
  • Axis & Allies
  • Battle of Marengo
  • Benefits of Playing Board Games
  • Best New Wargame on Gettysburg
  • Brandywine Options
  • Brandywine Q&A
  • Brandywine Tutorial
  • Cart
  • Checkout
  • Command Post Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Dracula Rules Q&A
  • Forum
  • FREE Board Games
  • Get a FREE Supremacy Expansion!
  • Get FREE Measuring Sticks!
  • Gettysburg
  • Home
    • Help Wanted
  • Little Bighorn Q&A
  • Marengo Q&A
  • Mega Supremacy
  • Mega Supremacy Player Guide
  • Military Board Games -Wargames
  • My Account
    • Logout
  • Play It Out!
  • Production
    • Country Colors
    • Fast but Deep
    • Good Signs Indeed
    • Our Vision
    • Split US?
    • Superpowers?
    • Worthy of Supremacy
  • Products
  • Promotions
  • Pub Battles
    • Brandywine
  • Pub Battles -Total War
  • Risk –Game of World Conquest
  • Save 15% On Any Order!
  • Supremacy 2020 -Game of Superpowers
    • After Action Reports
      • 2nd American Civil War in Pix
      • Islamic Front
      • Market Fix -How did I get into this mess?
      • Rule Britannia!
      • Terrorist Play Test
    • Ask Not
    • Field Marshals
    • Fortuna -Game Cards Deck
    • Optional Supremacy
    • Reviews
    • Strategy
      • A Sword in it’s Sheath
      • Aggression- New player Strategy Tips
      • As If
      • Attack First, Then Ask Questions
      • China, the Next Nazi Germany?
      • Credibility?
      • International
      • Power Play
      • RDFs
      • Strategy in the Cards
      • Strategy of Mother Russia
      • Strategy of the Rising Sun: Players Strategy for Japan
      • The Game Starts Too Slow!
      • Ukraine
    • What’s so Great About Supremacy?
    • FAQs
    • Supremacy Rules Questions
    • What’s New?
  • Supremacy 2020 PnP Download
  • Supremacy Tutorial
  • WarGames
  • Waterloo
  • Yop Poll Archive

Archives

  • November 2024
  • September 2024
  • February 2024
  • December 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • October 2021
  • July 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • January 2019
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • July 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • July 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • January 2015
  • November 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014

Categories

  • AAR (7)
  • Dracula (11)
  • Game Play (115)
  • Kriegsspiel (26)
  • News (44)
  • Pirates (9)
  • Production (50)
  • Pub Battles (102)
  • Review (23)
  • Strategy (44)
  • Supremacy (8)
  • Uncategorized (59)
  • Variant (20)

WordPress

  • Log in
  • WordPress

Subscribe

  • Entries (RSS)
  • Comments (RSS)

CyberChimps WordPress Themes

© Command Post Games